Okay, you're being deliberately difficult. I knew there was an issue with MedRxIV, but didn't know exactly what it was. Do you deny that article is NOT peer reviewed, and that it does NOT provide any actual stats about the population under study? Tell me, how many "participants" were in that study he quoted? Give me a number... I'll wait. Also, just because you can edit Wikipedia, doesn't mean it's unreliable. It's peer reviewed. I believe certain people have higher levels of trust on Wikipedia. So, if you made an erroneous change just for the hell of it... that change would likely be detected very quickly, the change deleted, and your ability to edit future Wikipedia articles (at least under that account or email) would be diminished.
So, you STILL don't believe me about MedRxIV being garbage? Here, read this... it's an advertisement for MedRxIV (ie - it's "open source" meaning pretty much anyone can submit anything that is not peer reviewed):